On the 1st November 1965, during high winds, three out of a group of eight cooling towers at Ferrybridge ‘C’ Power Station collapsed, with the remaining towers sustaining severe structural damage. The towers, each 375 feet high, had been constructed closer together than was usual and had greater shell diameters and shell surface area then any previous towers. The design and construction contract for the towers had been given to Film Cooling Towers (concrete) Ltd. in 1962.
High winds were considered to be the trigger for the collapse, but an inquiry found the exact cause to be an amalgamation of several other factors in their design:
- British Standard wind speeds had not been used in the design resulting in the design wind pressures at the top of the tower being 19% lower than it should have been.
- Basic wind speed was interpreted and used as the average over a one minute period, whereas, in reality, the structures are susceptible to much shorter gusts.
- The wind loading had been based on experiments using a single isolated tower. The grouping of the towers created turbulence on the leeward ones – the ones that did actually collapse.
- Safety margins had not really covered any uncertainties in the wind loadings.
There had been, it was decided, a serious underestimation of the wind loading in the initial design.
Fortunately, no one was killed or injured in the accident.
![]() |
![]() |
A cooling tower comes crashing to the ground during high winds at Ferrybridge ‘C’ Power Station in 1965. | The aftermath of the incident. Three of the eight cooling towers were completely destroyed. |
Cooling tower condenser systems are designed to throw out the heat from the medium (usually water) used to condense refrigerant gas in either an open-circuit or closed-circuit configuration.
Yes, it is catastropic failure of colling tower because of dynamics wind load..
I want to use the images in my book on Design of RC structures.Can you give permission or give me the source?
This reply is triggered by Roger Newbould’s posting yesterday. I have several photographs of the reconstruction and strengthening works, which I have uploaded to Flickr. If you are interested in using them for any future publication, I can send you the link.
it will be interesting if you send the link to see the pictures
Matza
Try this and let me know if it works please. It also has Ratcliffe,Didcot and Kilroot
https://www.flickr.com/gp/128441567@N05/58d0HR
Tony
This is a good explanation of the collapse. I analysed the structures post collapse, and concluded that a single tower without the complexities of adjacent towers would have reinforcement stresses exceeding yield at a wind speed of approximately 68 mph. On the day of the collapse, the station anemometer was indicating gusts of 72 mph.
I designed the strengthening works for the remaining 5 towers, and supervised the rehabilitation project.
The cooling towers did not blow down 1st nov 1965. i started work there april 1966 and the towers were still intact .I dont know the exact date but i think i was either 1966 0r 1967.
Fred. Please cross check the dates.
im sure my grandad took the pictures and gave them to the power sation years ago. Lesley Newbould
Watched the collapse, from our dining room window in Sutton Lane Bryam